While installing the rpm I get a message that I'm missing libMesaGL.so
and libMesaGLU.so
But I do have Mesa-3.2 installed.
Any ideas whats wrong ?
Are there actually files named libMesaGL.so and libMesaGLU.so on your
system?
You should be able to use the force flag on the rpm install to install it
anyway. I meant to split out the glcanvcas module into a separate rpm, but
I ran out of time...
路路路
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
robin@AllDunn.com
> Are there actually files named libMesaGL.so and libMesaGLU.so on your
> system?
>
Nop
I have libGL.so and libGLU.so and its from Mesa-3.2-2.rpm.
Is is posible that they have changed the name of the libs in the
distribution
?
Could be. The GL and GLU names are the same as used by the real OpenGL.
Maybe Mesa is just tryingto be more compatible... You can probably make
symlinks using the MesaGL names and be okay.
路路路
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
robin@AllDunn.com
Could be. The GL and GLU names are the same as used by the real OpenGL.
Maybe Mesa is just tryingto be more compatible... You can probably make
symlinks using the MesaGL names and be okay.
I tried that already. But installing the rpm is imposlible (--force doesn't
help) since the dependensies of the libs aren't registered. I'll probably
have to build from source, but I was hoping to avoid that.