20120530 test build uploaded

wxPython Dev
1

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

   Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
   URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
   Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

Have fun!
R'bot

2

Werner, this build has the origin fix for wx.StaticBox on MSW. Please test using widgets as the child of the static box, which are in a sizer that is assigned to the static box. The origin is offset from the top and sides the number of dialog units suggested by Microsoft in their style guide.

Sam, this build has your threading fixes patch applied. Please test with your custom build that you used before to identify the places that needed to be fixed to see if there are any new ones.

Thanks!

···

On 5/30/12 4:15 PM, R'bot wrote:

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

    Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
    URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
    Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

Have fun!
R'bot

--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman

3

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

    Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
    URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
    Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

Have fun!
R'bot

Werner, this build has the origin fix for wx.StaticBox on MSW. Please test using widgets as the child of the static box, which are in a sizer that is assigned to the static box. The origin is offset from the top and sides the number of dialog units suggested by Microsoft in their style guide.

Will do, but it won't be before middle of next week at the earliest.

Werner

···

On 31/05/2012 19:00, Robin Dunn wrote:

On 5/30/12 4:15 PM, R'bot wrote:
Sam, this build has your threading fixes patch applied. Please test with your custom build that you used before to identify the places that needed to be fixed to see if there are any new ones.

Thanks!

4

Hi Robin,

staticboxanddoublebuffer2.py (1.89 KB)

···

On 31/05/2012 19:00, Robin Dunn wrote:

On 5/30/12 4:15 PM, R'bot wrote:

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

    Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
    URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
    Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

Have fun!
R'bot

Werner, this build has the origin fix for wx.StaticBox on MSW. Please test using widgets as the child of the static box, which are in a sizer that is assigned to the static box. The origin is offset from the top and sides the number of dialog units suggested by Microsoft in their style guide.

It kind of works:-( . If I make the StaticBox proportion=1 and flag=wx.EXPAND things look fine, but I can't figure out how to size the SB just large enough for the containing controls.

I attached the code I used for the test, am I still doing something wrong?

Werner

5

Ok, it looks like the static box's DoGetBestSize needs to check if there is a sizer and use it. I'll get that done for the next preview.

···

On 6/3/12 9:12 AM, Werner wrote:

Hi Robin,

On 31/05/2012 19:00, Robin Dunn wrote:

On 5/30/12 4:15 PM, R'bot wrote:

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

Have fun!
R'bot

Werner, this build has the origin fix for wx.StaticBox on MSW. Please
test using widgets as the child of the static box, which are in a
sizer that is assigned to the static box. The origin is offset from
the top and sides the number of dialog units suggested by Microsoft in
their style guide.

It kind of works:-( . If I make the StaticBox proportion=1 and
flag=wx.EXPAND things look fine, but I can't figure out how to size the
SB just large enough for the containing controls.

I attached the code I used for the test, am I still doing something wrong?

--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman

6

I don't know if it was already reported - I'm not following wxPython
as close as I would like.

There is a missing header file from the wxPython-src-2.9.4.0.b20120530.tar.bz2
It's the include/wx/x11/private/wrapxkb.h

I just grabbed from here:
http://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk/include/wx/x11/private/wrapxkb.h

then everything went smooth.

Regargs,
Ricardo

···

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:15 AM, R'bot <robin@alldunn.com> wrote:

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

7

Forget to say, this was compiling on linux

Ricardo

···

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ricardo Pedroso <rmdpedroso@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:15 AM, R'bot <robin@alldunn.com> wrote:

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

I don't know if it was already reported - I'm not following wxPython
as close as I would like.

There is a missing header file from the wxPython-src-2.9.4.0.b20120530.tar.bz2
It's the include/wx/x11/private/wrapxkb.h

I just grabbed from here:
http://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk/include/wx/x11/private/wrapxkb.h

then everything went smooth.

8

Thanks. I think that folder was being excluded because it was just for the wxX11 port, but I guess it is now being included by the wxGTK port too. I'll remove that exclusion from script that builds the tarball.

···

On 6/5/12 8:53 AM, Ricardo Pedroso wrote:

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ricardo Pedroso<rmdpedroso@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:15 AM, R'bot<robin@alldunn.com> wrote:

Hi,

A new test build of wxPython has been uploaded.

   Version: 2.9.4.0.b20120530
   URL: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530
   Changes: http://wxPython.kosoftworks.com/preview/20120530/CHANGES.html

I don't know if it was already reported - I'm not following wxPython
as close as I would like.

There is a missing header file from the wxPython-src-2.9.4.0.b20120530.tar.bz2
It's the include/wx/x11/private/wrapxkb.h

I just grabbed from here:
http://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk/include/wx/x11/private/wrapxkb.h

then everything went smooth.

Forget to say, this was compiling on linux

--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman

9

What would be the right approach to have a SizedStaticBox?

E.g. for the panel the Python class (wx.PyPanel) is used as a base for SizedPanel, will there be a PyStaticBox?

Werner

···

On 04/06/2012 19:14, Robin Dunn wrote:

It kind of works:-( . If I make the StaticBox proportion=1 and
flag=wx.EXPAND things look fine, but I can't figure out how to size the
SB just large enough for the containing controls.

I attached the code I used for the test, am I still doing something wrong?

Ok, it looks like the static box's DoGetBestSize needs to check if there is a sizer and use it. I'll get that done for the next preview.

10

Doubtful. It won't be necessary in Phoenix and I'm trying to spend as little time working on Classic as I can.

···

On 6/11/12 12:44 AM, Werner wrote:

On 04/06/2012 19:14, Robin Dunn wrote:

It kind of works:-( . If I make the StaticBox proportion=1 and
flag=wx.EXPAND things look fine, but I can't figure out how to size the
SB just large enough for the containing controls.

I attached the code I used for the test, am I still doing something
wrong?

Ok, it looks like the static box's DoGetBestSize needs to check if
there is a sizer and use it. I'll get that done for the next preview.

What would be the right approach to have a SizedStaticBox?

E.g. for the panel the Python class (wx.PyPanel) is used as a base for
SizedPanel, will there be a PyStaticBox?

--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman