Well, I wouldn’t go too far out. I run just about every OS on the face of the planet that I can…; manually with a brain, But I prefer XP.
Maybe in a week or so (the higher up the dev-chain) might get wind of the “glitches”.
Yes, reporting on these lists is a good thing to do overall(even if it is a simple question),
…tho devs(I am working on PHOENIX also if you didn’t know) have a hard time dealing with everything,
because of what most of us call the MIA or AWOL Effect(Real-Life) it produces on us at times.
The Best thing to do is keep excited about it(YES it works!), but there is still a lot to do yet.
Just because maybe wx3 has some problems at the moment shouldn’t bother most users much anyway.
One must realize that wxWidgets and wxPython are 2 seperate things(I have had problems with this…).
What we need is more wxPython Devs on board; Esp like Andrea. Devs On the wxPython Side of things…
It is a hectic process at times because maybe 20 people are working on 20 different things; etc.
go figure.
For example, you have an application, and would like to test.
Besides PY3 and the extras I have done and am working on with the demo…, If you don’t need exactly PY3 at the moment, then your best bet would be to STICK with classic ATM.
Yes, there are a few extra wow I like that, its new moments with PHOENIX, but for the most part…
… ATM… We are waiting on Robin to wrap up Classic 3.0(I assume), then move on to Phoenix, then integrate all the ahead work we(wxHelpers/wxDevelopers) have done for the projects sake,
then if he manages to have a good nights sleep after this then we can poke him about it again. *#@^&$
Cool! Gotta love it!. Drop a note on the wxPython-dev if ya are looking to run any of the fancy widgets on PHOENIX and might be troubled by that build(State the build- Ex: Maybe the retro3 one I gave ya).
SourceCoder is working as you well know…2.9.5 ATM tho and still developing.
DUH_NOTE: If you ever download a snapshot build as a tester or developer, and IT WORKS(alright for you), then keep a copy of it(teh archive with compiled stuff).
It may be your only working copy…
hmmm = [Remember wxWidgets is what builds wxPython]
If at all, at this point I would use the PHOENIX build I have (and is the cutting edge) until another snapshot comes out that works. Then maybe consider upgrading… (remember the wx.pth; you CAN have 1000wxVERSIONS installed and working all at the same time)
There are a lot of things to consider. Patience 1st. or help. Help and patience is prefered.
Thanks I could help out.
ugh…
Mooo
···
On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:07:24 PM UTC-6, Johnsons in DE wrote:
Metallicow,
Sorry for taking a while to respond. Thank you again for your help.
Using the archive you attached to your post, and the code from the
GitHub repositories you pointed me to, I was able to get wxPython
Phoenix to work. (Yeah!)
I am beginning to wonder if wxPython 3.0.0.0 does not work properly
on Windows XP. (We both, I believe, are running Win XP SP3).
I saw your posts on the wxPython-dev forum about your issues with
wxPython 3 Classic. Interestingly (to me), among the list of
scripts that crashed for you in the wxPython demo was
MultiChoiceDialog.py.
Robin suggested that something might be wrong with your
Python/wxPython installation, but I’m not so sure. I also tried
wxPython 3 Classic on my computer and had the same problems
you did.
So, I'm now wondering if the Phoenix snapshot builds aren't botched
after all. If wxPython 3 Classic isn’t working for us, why
should we expect the equivalent Phoenix build to?
I do have access to a Windows 7 computer, so if you'd like me to, I
could test wxPython 3 Classic and/or Phoenix on it to test my
speculations.
Thank you and happy new year.