Is there a simpler way? If not, is the above code sound?
This looks okay but why not just get the itemId of
the previous and then do a regular Insert after that item?
That requires special-case processing when there is no previous item,
unless I'm missing a trick?
Since there is a method which has a "position" parameter, do you think it
would be worthwhile adding a means of getting the position into the API?
That seems to fit nicely into the "Principle of Least Surprise".
Is there a simpler way? If not, is the above code sound?
This looks okay but why not just get the itemId of the previous and then do a regular Insert after that item?
That requires special-case processing when there is no previous item, unless I'm missing a trick?
You're right, but if there are lots of items it may be more efficient to have and check for the special case rather than traverse all the items...
Since there is a method which has a "position" parameter, do you think it would be worthwhile adding a means of getting the position into the API? That seems to fit nicely into the "Principle of Least Surprise".
Makes sense. You should add a feature request for it.
···
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman http://wxPython.org Java give you jitters? Relax with wxPython!