- I do not like the division Payware or Close source, it gives the
feeling - at least for me - closed source ==> payware. A clear
separation between payware and closed source, but "gratisware" would
be welcome.
A small note about this point. Some of my applications - logically the
biggest - are closed source, not because I want to hide the code, but
because I do not know/find the best way to distribute my own libraries.
Py2exe is by far the most comfortable solution.
- What about a disctinction between applications/libraries? Eg.
jmgraph.
- I do not like the division Payware or Close source, it gives the
feeling - at least for me - closed source ==> payware. A clear
separation between payware and closed source, but "gratisware" would
be welcome.
Ok, a section Freeware and Payware.
Payware is something a negative word.
Maybe "Commercial" is better.
I change this
A small note about this point. Some of my applications - logically the
biggest - are closed source, not because I want to hide the code, but
because I do not know/find the best way to distribute my own libraries.
Py2exe is by far the most comfortable solution.
Ok, you can add your applications.
I would prefer a column "Category" because I think, it leads
to more overview, but most are against it, so I removed it.
Also to all people:
the description of the programs is maybe not good for all programs,
feel free to change them.
I mostly took the headline from their homepages.
- What about a disctinction between applications/libraries? Eg.
jmgraph.
- I do not like the division Payware or Close source, it gives the
feeling - at least for me - closed source ==> payware. A clear
separation between payware and closed source, but "gratisware" would
be welcome.
Ok, a section Freeware and Payware.
Payware is something a negative word.
What about:
Open Source:
Editor (Headline):
Editor1: Table
Editor2: Table
Graphics, Multimedia, Sound (Headline):
App1: Table
....
- I do not like the division Payware or Close source, it gives the
feeling - at least for me - closed source ==> payware. A clear
separation between payware and closed source, but "gratisware" would
be welcome.
Ok, a section Freeware and Payware.
Payware is something a negative word.
What about:
Open Source:
Editor (Headline):
Editor1: Table
Editor2: Table
Graphics, Multimedia, Sound (Headline):
App1: Table
....
Done.
You can still revert the last version.
But I like it much more than, better overview
(there were already 51 open source applications in one list)
- I do not like the division Payware or Close source, it gives the
feeling - at least for me - closed source ==> payware. A clear
separation between payware and closed source, but "gratisware" would
be welcome.
Ok, a section Freeware and Payware.
Payware is something a negative word.
What about:
Open Source:
Editor (Headline):
Editor1: Table
Editor2: Table
Graphics, Multimedia, Sound (Headline):
App1: Table
....
Freeware:
Commerical:
...
I would not create too many subgroups, what about:
Open Source:
Editors and development tools/frameworks
Other programming tools
Other applications
Freeware, Shareware and Commercial:
Programming tools
Other applications
I have just updated; do you find, they are to much?
I would combine the first two, as e.g. Dabo and Boa should be listed in
both of them.
Werner
I do not, the office could be removed, I think.
I remove it.
I will not mix in anymore, please feel free (you or all other
participants) to add/modify or revert to the structure
with a flat table (without categories).
I'm glad to gave the page a little impulse.
(I found/find it important to offer/gave an
overview of the current/future (existing) applications.
···
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:01:51 +0200, "Werner F. Bruhin" <werner.bruhin@free.fr> wrote: