Any news on a 2.5 version of wxpython for Ubuntu?
路路路
--
Peter Damoc
Hacker Wannabe
http://www.sigmacore.net/
Peter Damoc wrote:
Any news on a 2.5 version of wxpython for Ubuntu?
I've been told that the Ubuntu folks are going to start tracking the 2.5 series for the next Ubuntu release, so look for it to start showing up in their package repositories for the Hedgehot release.
路路路
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org Java give you jitters? Relax with wxPython!
Will do! 
路路路
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:12:48 -0800, Robin Dunn <robin@alldunn.com> wrote:
Peter Damoc wrote:
Any news on a 2.5 version of wxpython for Ubuntu?
I've been told that the Ubuntu folks are going to start tracking the 2.5
series for the next Ubuntu release, so look for it to start showing up
in their package repositories for the Hedgehot release.
--
Peter Damoc
Hacker Wannabe
http://www.sigmacore.net/
well... actually I didn't 
Just grabbed a Fedora RPM and alien-ated it to a deb then
dpkg --install ...
the only problems I had were the fact that it didn't installed the wx.pth and wxversion.py and... it looked for libtiff.so.3 when I had libtiff.so.4 but I guess that this is normal stuff for a kamikaze system (I'm running Hoary ).
Now that I've seen how wxpython2.5 looks on linux... 2.4 looks even uglier.
Anyway... great job Robin!
路路路
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:15:41 +0200, Peter Damoc <pdamoc@gmx.net> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:12:48 -0800, Robin Dunn <robin@alldunn.com> wrote:
Peter Damoc wrote:
Any news on a 2.5 version of wxpython for Ubuntu?
I've been told that the Ubuntu folks are going to start tracking the 2.5
series for the next Ubuntu release, so look for it to start showing up
in their package repositories for the Hedgehot release.Will do!
--
Peter Damoc
Hacker Wannabe
http://www.sigmacore.net/
Peter Damoc wrote:
well... actually I didn't
Just grabbed a Fedora RPM and alien-ated it to a deb then
dpkg --install ...the only problems I had were the fact that it didn't installed the wx.pth and wxversion.py and...
Those will be in the wxPython-common RPMs, you'll want to alien one of those too.
it looked for libtiff.so.3 when I had libtiff.so.4 but I guess that this is normal stuff for a kamikaze system (I'm running Hoary ).
Can alien build from a source rpm? If so then this would be the way to do it, as then it would link to the libs you have on your system rather than the ones on my Fedora build machine. Otherwise you might want to look for compatibility packages so you can have both versions of the libtiff shared library.
路路路
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org Java give you jitters? Relax with wxPython!
Peter Damoc wrote:
well... actually I didn't
Just grabbed a Fedora RPM and alien-ated it to a deb then
dpkg --install ...the only problems I had were the fact that it didn't installed the
wx.pth and wxversion.py and...Those will be in the wxPython-common RPMs, you'll want to alien one of
those too.
I just copied them from my windows install (I'm one lazy dude)
it looked for libtiff.so.3 when I had
libtiff.so.4 but I guess that this is normal stuff for a kamikaze system
(I'm running Hoary ).Can alien build from a source rpm? If so then this would be the way to
do it, as then it would link to the libs you have on your system rather
than the ones on my Fedora build machine. Otherwise you might want to
look for compatibility packages so you can have both versions of the
libtiff shared library.
I will try the src approach today (if I can find the time) anyway... I solved the libtiff problem by simply creating libtiff.so.3 as a symlink to the available libtiff library.
路路路
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:58:04 -0800, Robin Dunn <robin@alldunn.com> wrote:
--
Peter Damoc
Hacker Wannabe
http://www.sigmacore.net/