I know <http://wiki.wxpython.org/Widget%20Inspection%20Tool>.
But I couldn't find a official project website or developer contact
informations or something like this where I can post problems.
The code on
<http://www.wxpython.org/Phoenix/docs/html/lib.mixins.inspection.html>
use the wx.lib.sized_controls which is against the rule to keep an
example as simple as possible.
Or does the inspector only work with wx.lib.sized_controls ?
I know <http://wiki.wxpython.org/Widget%20Inspection%20Tool>\.
But I couldn't find a official project website or developer contact
informations or something like this where I can post problems.
Robin Dunn developed this.
The code on
<http://www.wxpython.org/Phoenix/docs/html/lib.mixins.inspection.html>
use the wx.lib.sized_controls which is against the rule to keep an
example as simple as possible.
Not sure what you mean here.
Or does the inspector only work with wx.lib.sized_controls ?
It works with any wxPython program.
Werner
On 4/1/2015 19:17, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
Robin Dunn developed this.
Then this information should appear on the wiki and minimal in the
documtation about it.
Currently it looks like a external application.
> The code on
> <http://www.wxpython.org/Phoenix/docs/html/lib.mixins.inspection.html>
> use the wx.lib.sized_controls which is against the rule to keep an
> example as simple as possible.
Not sure what you mean here.
sized_controls are an extension to the standard wx-libs. This isn't the
default way to handle sizers.
In this example two components are mixed - sized_controls and the
inspector. And by-the-way there is no hyperlink to the sized_control
documentation at all.
Just use the standard/default sizer handling there to inform the users
how to get the inspector running and don't confuse them with concepts
(sized_controls) that are not standard and not known by everybody.
> Or does the inspector only work with wx.lib.sized_controls ?
It works with any wxPython program.
Ok, nice to know. Then the problem is on my side. 
On 2015-04-01 19:31 Werner <wernerfbd@gmx.ch> wrote: