Are you talking about the timing of a double-click? That is, detecting
a double-click rather than two single-clicks? Because, otherwise, your
question doesn't make any sense to me. There is no right-click "area"
in Windows.
···
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:20:32 +0200, Stef Mientki <S.Mientki@ru.nl> wrote:
The mouse right area is much smaller in wxPython
than in my normal operating system.
What I mean is that it's much more difficult (yes I move really fast)
to generate a right mouse click under wxPython,
than under other winXP programs.
So I guess that with wxPython,
the maximum position change within a certain time limit is quit
different.
Can these parameters be adjusted ?
--
Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
Tim Roberts wrote:
The mouse right area is much smaller in wxPython
than in my normal operating system.
What I mean is that it's much more difficult (yes I move really fast)
to generate a right mouse click under wxPython,
than under other winXP programs.
So I guess that with wxPython,
the maximum position change within a certain time limit is quit
different.
Can these parameters be adjusted ?
Are you talking about the timing of a double-click?
No
That is, detecting
a double-click rather than two single-clicks? Because, otherwise, your
question doesn't make any sense to me. There is no right-click "area"
in Windows.
I don't know how it's organized in windows,
but if I right click in a non-wxPython program,
I have a hit rate (the program detects the right mouse button) of 10 out 10,
if I try right click on a ogl-shape in wxPython, I've a hit rate of 1 out of 10 
I've to admit that I always right click "on the flight",
i.e. I know what's to be expected on a right click,
in general a popup,
so during right mouse click I already start moving to the item (in the popup, not yet visible) that I want to hit with my left mouse button.
Seems a weird behaviour, but with a pen instead of a mouse this quiet normal.
cheers,
Stef Mientki
···
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:20:32 +0200, Stef Mientki <S.Mientki@ru.nl> wrote: