"Roger Binns" <rogerb@rogerbinns.com> writes:
Chris Barker wrote:
I don't think we should choose the most common or normal..we should
choose the best form for wxPython.common/normal implies best (or rather I meant it
I agree with Chris Barker that the best solution doesn't necessarily mean the one most commonly documented in the C++ docs, but I agree with you that the x, y form is better. When it comes to both readability (which Python emphasizes most), and writability (less typing, don't have to remember closing extra parentheses), the x, y form is better.
Also, most every other GUI toolkit out there uses the x, y form
(java, .net, wxruby, wxlua, wx4j, etc.), and if wxPython is ever included with Python, it needs to be improved for the sake of Python programmers, not wxWidgets C++ compatibility.