> a) is there a way to add "Home","End" keybindings to get to the top
> or bottom of the displayed html
Ctrl-Home and Ctrl-End should already do it.
Indeed, they do. Is there a way to bind Home and End
to these functions (sorry, but I am used to this
type of binding - maybe this is one of these Unix vs. Windows
things again ?)
[Search features wishlist]
These may be possible, but would have to be done at the C++ level.
Enter feature requests for them.
Just to be sure: via sourceforge, right?
(Should I send an e-mail to Vaclav Slavik as well ?)
> f) Is it possible/planned to let the user add annotations to
> the documents ?
> (Actually I a not so sure how trivial this is, in particular
> across documentation upgrades
Probably very difficult, but that hasn't stopped Vaclav in the past.
> g) Is the display of mathml (http://www.w3.org/Math/)
something which is possible/planned for the future?
Not with wxHtmlWindow, but once we have pluggable html viewer windows
(wxHtmlWindow, embedded IE, or embedded Mozilla, all available via the
same API) then it would probably be doable. That's going to be a while
though.
Should I enter (seperate ?) feature requests for f) and g) as well?
a) is there a way to add "Home","End" keybindings to get to the top
or bottom of the displayed html
Ctrl-Home and Ctrl-End should already do it.
Indeed, they do. Is there a way to bind Home and End
to these functions (sorry, but I am used to this
type of binding - maybe this is one of these Unix vs. Windows
things again ?)
No, just the defaults from the wxScrolledWindow that wxHtmlWindow derived from.
You can catch the key events from the wxHtmlWindow and call Scroll yourself.
[Search features wishlist]
These may be possible, but would have to be done at the C++ level.
Enter feature requests for them.
(Should I send an e-mail to Vaclav Slavik as well ?)
He will see it there, and is probably reading this message too.
f) Is it possible/planned to let the user add annotations to
the documents ?
(Actually I a not so sure how trivial this is, in particular
across documentation upgrades
Probably very difficult, but that hasn't stopped Vaclav in the past.
something which is possible/planned for the future?
Not with wxHtmlWindow, but once we have pluggable html viewer windows
(wxHtmlWindow, embedded IE, or embedded Mozilla, all available via the
same API) then it would probably be doable. That's going to be a while
though.
Should I enter (seperate ?) feature requests for f) and g) as well?
Yes, the requests should be separate.
路路路
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman http://wxPython.org Java give you jitters? Relax with wxPython!
Should I enter (seperate ?) feature requests for f) and g) as well?
To be honest wxHTML will never display MathML, unless either somebody
else implements it or somebody pays me to implement it. You know,
it's not something you commonly need... OTOH, as Robin said we plan
to wrap Mozilla, which should help (you may wish to check out
wxMozilla project, too).
As for f), I plan to include it in Documancer (a separate project), if
I find an intelligent way to do it, so we can consider backporting it
to wxWindows if I succeed. I'm not sure it's worth it in generic
purpose help viewer, though (I have no intention to use any other
language than Python in Documancer, so it would have to be rewritten
in C++).
- maybe this is one of these Unix vs. Windows