Thanks for checking... This means that my eyes are not so bad :),
because I was comparing with the barcodes generated by this webpage:
http://www.barcodemill.com/index.php
Ricardo
···
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:41 +0200, Hugues JEAN-BAPTISTE wrote:
Hi Ricardo,
I have tested "Code 39" and "Code 128" with a barcode scanner and they
have been read succesfully.
The third doesn't work certainly because the parameters of my scanner is
not good.Friendly.